Regulatory & Audit Response
A finding with a deadline. Closed on paper, or closed in the work?
Findings that come back
An audit or regulatory finding sets a date. The usual response is a remediation project: fix the instances found, document the fix, close the finding. The next audit samples the same work and finds the same thing, because the work that produced the finding never changed.
Treat the finding as an operating requirement
The Operating Requirements Model tests any requirement, including one handed to you by an auditor, against five questions. A finding that answers all five is built into the work and produces its own evidence.
Writing requirements that pass all five is taught in the Foundation Course. Applying it to a live finding with a deadline is the Practitioner Intensive.
Learn it, then apply it to your own transformation.
Closing one in the operating model means making that activity happen, and leave its record, at the source. Another downstream review only finds the gap again.
What is the difference between remediation and operating change?
Remediation fixes the instances the auditor found. Operating change alters the work that produced them, so the next sample comes back clean.
Where does ZBTOS teach this?
The Foundation Course teaches a cohort to write operating requirements that pass all five lenses. The Practitioner Intensive applies it to a live requirement, such as a finding with a deadline.
Stay current. New reads on controls that run in the work. Published by ETEGY.
Get the ZBTOS Briefing →